Posted in Philosophy

Human Ethos

Warrior ethos is a disciplined code of courage, self-mastery, honor, and sacrifice that binds a person to something larger than self-preservation. A code reserved for and revered by the military. But that view is too myopic. The real value isn’t military; it’s human. In a divided world, what matters most isn’t whether we see ourselves as warriors, but whether we live as responsible global citizens—people guided by discipline, courage, duty, restraint, and moral clarity.

Discipline is the foundation. Not dramatic moments of discipline, but consistent daily effort. Get up. Do the work. Tell the truth. Control your impulses. Finish what you start. Without self-mastery, freedom is mostly an illusion. A person ruled by comfort, distraction, and thirst for immediate gratification isn’t truly free. They are simply well-entertained and are puppets of another master.

Courage; true courage isn’t swagger, rage, or noise. It is moral clarity under pressure. It is the willingness to do what’s right even when afraid. It is the restraint to refuse what is wrong even when anger, power, or opportunity make it tempting. Courage isn’t just standing firm when dishonesty might be easier. It’s also refusing cruelty when it would be easy, refusing excess force when compassion is available, and rejecting the seductive lie that winning justifies everything. It’s taking responsibility for your actions without blaming others or spreading falsehoods. Without restraint, courage becomes aggression. Without moral clarity, it turns into recklessness disguised as virtue.

Duty gives courage direction. A meaningful life is rarely founded on self-indulgence. It is built on obligation—family, community, work, conscience, and the broader human connection we share with people beyond our tribe, nation, politics, or religion. The world doesn’t need more loud voices demanding rights without responsibility; it needs fewer. It needs steadier individuals willing to bear weight without expecting applause.

But ethos without humility becomes empty performance, a facade. Ethos without morality turns into brutality. Ethos without restraint becomes hypocrisy masked in noble words. That is why the first battle is not against an enemy. It is against yourself. It is against selfishness, vanity, and the constant urge to excuse ourselves while harshly judging and blaming others.

And that leads to an uncomfortable question: how many of the “leaders” who demand discipline, sacrifice, loyalty, and courage from others actually practice those virtues themselves? And if they do not, why do so many still follow those who demand what they will not live?  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

…. ..- — .- -. .. – -.–


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Posted in Philosophy, Political

Our Zimbardo Moment

We like to stare in the mirror and tell ourselves a flattering story: that we are the guardian, the steady hand after chaos, the adult in a disorderly world. But history is less sentimental. Power does not stay still. It expands, rationalizes, and—if left unchecked—redefines itself.

This is our Zimbardo[1] [2] moment. The guards didn’t start as tyrants. They became them over time. Not because of being inherently cruel, but because the role allowed it, rewarded it, and eventually made it the norm. We are unknowingly replicating that experiment both domestically and internationally. Once authority is absolute, it begins to reshape identity. Enforcement shifts into domination, control, and coercion.

The United States was never purely a guardian—though it once proudly assumed the mantle and maintained that stance. There was at least an effort at restraint, rules, institutional international bodies, and shared legitimacy. Now the tone has changed. When a nation declares, implicitly or explicitly, ‘we are a superpower and will act because we can,’ the world no longer sees stewardship. It sees a gorilla—massive, unchallenged, and increasingly indifferent to the damage it causes as it thrashes its arms around, asserts its will, and enforces its law and morality beyond its own borders.

This is not benevolent dominance; it is selective force. Weak nations aren’t protected because they are weak; they are often pressured because they are. Sovereignty becomes conditional, resources become targets, and nations are no longer seen as distinct societies with histories and rights. They are seen and treated as pieces on a board—deindividualized, reduced to utility.

The rhetoric stays polished: freedom, order, stability. But listen carefully. The rules are in effect—until they aren’t. Especially when the rule-maker finds them inconvenient. We hear; extraordinary threats justify extraordinary actions. But who decides what the threat is? Of course, the same hand that holds the power.

That is the pivot. When a hegemon starts to extend its internal narrative over external reality, and assumes its perception overrides others’ sovereignty. At that moment, it crossed from guardian to gorilla. Not because it abandoned ideals, but because it makes itself the exception to them.

And perhaps most dangerously, the world starts to comply. Domestic and international institutional capitulation—silent, gradual—strengthens the stance. Power, if not challenged, becomes assumed and then exploited on a massive scale.

The experiment never ends; it only scales. So the question is not whether the gorilla can justify the overt actions, but how the ape will be brought to heel. And history shows they always are, and the end is never pretty.  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

… – .- -. -.. / ..-. — .-. / – .-. ..- – ….


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

[1] Haney, Craig, Curtis Banks, and Philip G. Zimbardo. “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison.” International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1, no. 1 (1973): 69–97.

[2] Le Texier, Thibault. “Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.” American Psychologist 74, no. 7 (2019): 823–839.

Posted in Philosophy

Social Dichromacy…Missing the Threat

Is the danger unseen or deliberately ignored? The tiger has an unusual tactical advantage over most of its prey because those animals suffer from dichromacy, a color-vision limitation that makes the tiger’s bright orange-and-black stripes appear as muted greens and shadows. The prey may detect movement, but they cannot recognize the warning in time. By the time the predator is fully noticed, it is often already too late.

It appears we suffer from a form of social dichromacy. Our perception of danger, especially when disguised by deceit, charm, or false strength, is limited. People are not knowingly ignorant; they have become perceptually impaired. Like a tiger’s prey, they see movement but miss the deeper meaning. They notice someone’s presence but don’t recognize the danger; or worse, they see it but timidly choose comfort over confrontation.

Some see confidence but not menace; charisma but not manipulation. They notice the person, but miss the mortal threat. The fully developed danger exists, but isn’t recognized until surrender is already happening, and resisting becomes more difficult than giving in.

This is not a physical defect but a civic and moral failure. It stems from shallow thinking, lazy observation, herd mentality, groupthink, and a deliberate indifference to history’s cause and effect. The situation is often quite clear. We prefer not to look too closely. Familiarity calms us. Nostalgia tempts us. Easy promises weaken us. Those who prey upon us know our weakness and don’t hesitate to exploit it. Twisting the message just enough to make it sound special for each of us.

That is how societies drift backward while hoping, and being told, they are being saved. The missing perception channel doesn’t just distort individuals; it corrupts entire communities. We stop noticing danger where it most often resides: inside what flatters us, comforts us, and promises to make things simple and great again. Recognizing this collective blindness should motivate us to stay vigilant and not simply close our eyes.

The harder question is not whether danger is present, but this: what discipline, honesty, and courage are required to pierce the veil of our own dichromacy before the predator is no longer merely stalking us, but consuming us?  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

-… . .– .- .-. . / – …. . / -.-. — -. — .- -.


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read
Posted in Current Events, Philosophy

Capacity for Pain

Middle Eastern tolerance for pain is greater than expected. Once again, a Western power is repeating the same mistake with Iran as they have with much of the modern Middle East: they assume pain leads to surrender. That is a very Western way of understanding conflict: material, linear, and transactional. But in the Middle East, suffering is often not seen just as loss. It can also signify and reinforce the resolve for endurance, legitimacy, memory, and honor. Iran demonstrates this logic in one way; the Palestinians in another. Yet they both share and reveal a broader regional pattern of viewing pain not just as punishment but as proof that the struggle is real and, therefore, must be endured.

Iran exemplifies this concept most clearly. The Islamic Republic relies on the Karbala paradigm, martyrdom symbolism, and a political culture of resistance that has intensified since 1979. However, it is not powered solely by martyrdom. It also depends on maslahat—expediency, prudence, and the preservation of the state. This is the crucial point many outsiders miss. Tehran is not built to die heroically. It is constructed to endure, adapt, and survive. It promotes resistance when it benefits the system and compromises when necessary to maintain stability.

That instinct was shaped in ancestral times and hardened in recent history. The 1953 coup taught Iranians that foreign powers would overthrow a government when independence threatened outside interests. The 1979 revolution then fused anti-imperial memory with sacred politics. The Iran-Iraq War completed the lesson. It was prolonged, hugely destructive, and formative. It exemplified much of Iranian strategic thinking: that time itself can be weaponized. One does not always need a clear victory. One only needs to deny the enemy closure, increase his costs, outlast his patience, and drag him through the quagmire for as long as possible.

The Palestinian example demonstrates a similar pattern of resilience. The word sumud—meaning steadfastness—has long represented a way of enduring, surviving, and refusing to be erased regardless of hardship and genocide. A sumud approach fosters a determination to stay in place despite persistent attacks. Iran’s state-centered doctrine and propaganda also use this. Suffering can gain political importance and become a source of strength. Pain does not automatically erase identity; instead, it can bolster it. Bombing, siege, isolation, and coercion do not always lead to surrender. Sometimes, they deepen collective memory, increase grievances, renew the desire to resist, and feed intergenerational hostility and hate.

That is why Western strategy often misfires. It keeps viewing pain as if it were always disqualifying and debilitating. In this region, it is frequently absorbed, narrated, and repurposed. Iran has turned that into statecraft and proxy warfare across Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, the Houthis, and allied networks. Palestinians live it as the national standard bearer of steadfastness, resistance, and survival. If we continue to interpret these societies through a purely Western lens of cost, comfort, and quick resolution, why are we still shocked when assault results in resolve, not in surrender? NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

.. -. … …. .- .-.. .-.. .- ….


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read
Posted in Philosophy

Choice, Chance, Change

It’s easy to fall into a routine—a pattern, a path, a simple rut. After a while, it can feel like being a snake in a wagon-track after rain: pressed into the groove, unable to see a clean way out. Stuck. Destined to follow the track wherever it leads.

But remember, you helped get yourself into it, and you can help get yourself out. The way out begins with choice, then a chance, then change. Even when a situation feels unsolvable or risky, you can still act—if only to begin the process. Yes, many parts of life are socially or professionally controlled. Even inside those boundaries, there are choices—subtle ones, small ones, but choices, nonetheless. The point is to exercise them.

Every choice has consequences. That is not a reason to freeze; it is a reason to brace. The choices and chances do not have to be big, bodacious gestures. Small, incremental shifts can be deeply significant. Change often starts there: deciding you want it, choosing toward it, and accepting the chance that comes with each step.

You don’t have to wait for a grand opening, a sign, or even the perfect plan. You need to make a choice and follow through — today. Even a small pivot can change your life’s course. Many of us like the phrase  ‘turning over a new leaf’ because it is clean and peaceful. In practice, it is usually more complicated than the phrase suggests—longer-term, sometimes riskier. Still, the principle holds: be willing to turn the leaf and look for something new. Yes, there may be thorns. That comes with reaching. Sometimes the only way to discover is to try.

And if you think you’ve already turned every leaf in your effort to change, wait for spring. There will be a whole forest again—even the trees in your own yard will leaf out—offering a fresh crop of leaves to turn; nature is annoyingly generous that way. Take a deep breath and just start turning.  NeverFearTheDream     simplebender.com

– ..- .-. -. / – …. . / -.. .- — -. / .-.. . .- ..-.


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Posted in Philosophy

Peace Isn’t a Transaction

True peace involves transparency and lasting stability, not just temporary agreements that leave underlying issues unresolved.

Peace usually arrives in one of two ways: the combatants decide they’ve had enough, or one side is crushed. When the cost of continuing exceeds the cost of stopping, both parties yield—grudgingly—and accept a compromise. It’s rarely elegant. More often, it’s a deal both sides dislike, but it’s better than attending the next round of funerals.

Mediators can help when they are genuinely independent: attentive to each side’s fears, aims, and non-negotiables, and skilled at translating rage into terms that can be signed. A good mediator doesn’t erase the chasm; they build a narrow, temporary bridge and keep traffic moving long enough for a fragile truce to harden into something closer to peace.

But when the mediator wants something out of the game, the process shifts. Influence becomes leverage. The negotiation stops being about stabilizing a region and starts being about capturing value. Quiet “side letters” and backchannel commitments on resources, arms, protection, exclusive access to markets, manufacturing, or intellectual property tilt the table before the first public handshake. The parties are no longer bargaining over borders or security alone; they’re trading away remaining national assets and future autonomy to a broker whose primary loyalty is to their own gain.

That doesn’t produce peace. It produces a transactional truce: temporary, brittle, and designed to be violated and renegotiated. One side will test it, and the other will retaliate. Both will rearm. Both will reposition, and each will be desperately trying to win the mediator’s favor for the inevitable next round.

And the cold-eyed, self-impressed mediator will call it “progress,” label it “strategy,” and shop for new pressure points. This is not mediation; it is profiteering, prolonging pain for profit. An oversized, bombastic arms dealer in a tailored suit, prolonging the pain until the spoils are secured. Always boasting of skills that don’t exist, promising ridiculous timeframes, and fleecing the dying for the privilege of false hope.

The irony is hard to miss: if the combatants ever compared notes, exposed the hidden terms, and refused to be monetized, they might discover a common enemy—not across the front line but behind the curtain: the amoral mediator profiting from perpetual instability. NeverFearTheDream    simplebender.com

..— ….. – …. / ….- –… – ….


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Posted in Philosophy

Certainty of Uncertainty

Life is, at best, chaotic. The one thing you can count on is this: it will be filled with uncertainty. What hits you each day is the collision of countless variables—some predictable, most not. Family and friends. Strangers and rivals. Systems you can’t see. And the raw creators of nature itself.

Uncertainty isn’t a flaw in the design. It IS the design. Embracing it helps you build resilience, stay adaptable, and stay alive in the face of life’s surprises.

Some people try to wish or pray uncertainty away. But hoping for more certainty won’t help you push your limits; it usually does the opposite. It shortens your horizon and shrinks the map. It suppresses adventure. If someone wants a smaller life, that’s their choice. But uncertainty won’t be evicted. It will still show up—quietly or violently—on its own schedule.

When uncertainty knocks you down (and it will), we tend to choose one of three responses: stay down and quit, get up and struggle to regroup, or defiantly say, “Oh hell no,” and press harder against the change in plans. Any of these can be human in the moment. There’s nothing wrong with any of them, and frankly, each will be chosen at one time or another. But patterns become character. If you practice quitting, you’ll rarely have the fortitude to choose defiance when it matters.

Plan and prepare with a serious focus. Think through permutations. Recognize disadvantages while stacking small advantages to counter them. Formulate your plan and then hold it loosely while expecting the unexpected. Clarity doesn’t come from eliminating uncertainty; it comes from facing and moving through it. Make uncertainty your sparring partner, not your enemy. Embrace it. It’s already walking beside you and could become your best friend. NeverFearTheDream  simplebender.com


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read
Posted in Philosophy

Two Ends, One Arc, One Humanity

Two unique ends joined together in beauty...

We stand in awe at the wonder of a rainbow, where two ends seemingly anchored move with your motion. Two ends unite in a seamless band of color that reflects our shared human experience. The same unifying bands remind us that despite our differences, we are connected through the same light, the same colors, the same humanity.

Christian Lent begins in one sanctuary with penance: remember your mortality and The Sacrifice. Islamic Ramadan begins in another realm with a whispered intention: remember your dependence. Different rituals: yet, both trace back to the same broad spiritual lineage—Abraham. Fasting, repentance, charity, and self-denial are shared practices rooted in this common heritage. They are carried forward in both Islam and Christianity, illustrating our interconnected spiritual traditions.

Between those ends stretches the rainbow’s spectrum — red to violet, each band distinct, each shade necessary. The beauty is not in uniformity but in ordered diversity. Every band retains its identity while belonging to and building something larger.

Bias is what happens when we insist that only our perspective is right. When we claim ownership of the light and forget that our perceptions are shaped by perspective, we neglect the reality that shared understanding and compassion define humanity.

Fasting under a church steeple or a mosque minaret confronts the same human experience and encourages acceptance and understanding. The rainbow does not advocate for which end is the original or correct. It simply refracts what already exists, the light that we all are.

Unity is not sameness. It is recognition and acceptance. For the rainbow to exist, there must be interaction between sky and earth, sun and rain, and yet we can stand on different ground and share the same light, fostering openness and clarity.

When bias dissolves, what remains is not a blurred identity but a clearer vision of our interconnectedness. We realize that the bonds we share are not forced but natural, like the spectrum of a rainbow that was always one phenomenon, reflecting the unity inherent in our diversity.

Two unique ends. Shared colors. Common light. Humanity does not need to merge to be united. It only needs the clarity to see the arc. NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

. –. . .- -.-. . / … …. .- .-.. — — / … .- .-.. .- .- —

On Wednesday, February 18, 2026, Christians enter Lent and Muslims begin their first full fast of Ramadan. Ramadan and Lent align closely in 2026 and overlap meaningfully in 2027, a convergence that recurs roughly every 33 years, next appearing around 2059–2061. Ramadan follows a purely lunar calendar, while Lent follows a solar-lunar calculation tied to Easter; their seasons of sacrifice and faith overlap only when the drifting Islamic year aligns with the Christian liturgical cycle—an intersection that occurs roughly once every 33 years and can last several consecutive years before separating again.


Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss
by WCBarron

Buy at Amazon Buy at Barnes & Noble Buy at Books2Read

Posted in Philosophy

The World’s Lost Beacon

Before dawn, I watched a fishing boat riding the black seam of the horizon off the rugged, unmerciful Oregon coast. The winter swells were building as the storm approached, and one bright mast light—tiny at that distance—kept announcing itself. It bobbed and drifted, sliding right, dipping down, climbing back—never still. The rougher the water became, the more that light danced, hypnotic and uneasy, like a pulse you couldn’t stop watching.

I pictured the crew out there—cold, wet, working for every inch of their livelihood—rocking at the mercy of a winter ocean that doesn’t negotiate. Then the light softened. It blinked once. And then it was gone. Just gone.

I leaned forward and stared until my eyes hurt. Four possibilities flashed through my mind, half of them concerning: the boat had turned, the power had failed, the sea had taken it, or it had sailed over the horizon. When dawn finally thinned the night, I still couldn’t find the vessel. The view was magnificent—and bleakly vacant.

I kept turning it over. That bright beacon was the American Dream: a light you can earn into existence. Risk. Work. Pride in the day’s catch. A stubborn belief that effort matters. It also felt like something else—something more fragile than we like to admit. A vessel doesn’t survive the storm, and its light doesn’t stay bright just because it once was; it stays bright because someone maintains it. Someone powers it. Someone refuses to let it fail.

Now the larger beacon the world has watched—our democracy—looks less steady than it used to. Is the vessel simply turning, its beam shifting out of our line of sight? Or is it losing power? Is it taking on water from neglect, corruption, ego, and self-inflicted damage?

The ocean doesn’t care what flag flies on a boat. It has swallowed the famous and the foolish. What makes this loss feel different is that the light represented not a ship at all—it was a method: an educated citizenry, self-restraint, lawful transfer of power, and the courage to resist tyranny without becoming it. That doesn’t replicate easily. It’s not a gadget you install. It’s seamanship, practiced daily.

Democracy doesn’t need constant tinkering by people trying to remake it in their own image. It needs upkeep. It needs citizens who treat it like a shared vessel, not a private yacht. It needs leaders who care more about the ship and the crew than about the applause on the deck.

I kept scanning the horizon, straining for a pinprick of light—any sign the boat hadn’t gone under. If it’s only turned, the beam will come back. If it’s crippled, we’ll learn what we never wanted to learn: a beacon can fail. If it sailed away, it would be alone in the ocean, and risks increase, especially for mutiny. History doesn’t promise rescue or replacements.

And if we want the beacon back, it won’t be because we wished for it. It will be because we, the crew, set this ship right. Democracies fail the way machines do: ignored tolerances, deferred maintenance, and a crew that doesn’t heed the telltale sounds of failure. So here’s the corrective action: stop rewarding sabotage, stop normalizing lies, stop treating institutions like disposable parts. Do the boring work—vote, show up locally, protect the rulebook, and enforce consequences. If we don’t, the beacon won’t “fade,” but our vessel will lose power and be swallowed by the sea. It will be lost forever.  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

Joy in Alzheimer’s
W.C. Barron
Lap Around the Sun
Daily Steps Forward — W.C. Barron
Posted in Philosophy

Moral Fiber Held Hostage by Power

Morals are the guardrails of daily life. When laws are slow, ambiguous, or absent, morals keep neighbors from becoming predators. Yes—morals change, even within a single culture. Some call that “decline.” Others call it “advancement.” When morality ceases to be a shared thread and becomes a private permit, I’m only limited by my moral limits, which are the only ones that matter; social order is at risk.

We don’t have to guess whether moral change can be good. Slavery was defended based on profit and convenient readings of scripture. Interracial marriage was illegal in many states until 1967. Divorce was branded a moral failure, even as an escape from violence. Women who chose careers over homemaking were dismissed as selfish, as if ambition were a vice.

Even our smaller moral judgments have shifted. Tattoos and piercings, once shorthand for “irresponsible,” “a drunken folly,” or signs of criminal association, are now common, meaningful personal statements and art. Online dating used to carry a whiff of desperation, but now it’s ordinary, and even practical.

So the issue isn’t the changing landscape of morality. The issue is the persistent temptation of power to usurp it. It’s when a determined few, or an individual, insist that their morals should govern everyone else, while exempting themselves from the burden of society’s norms of consistency.

That’s when moral limits replace moral fiber. Moral fiber restrains the self. Moral limits wielded by the powerful are used to restrain others. When leaders claim to be the sole keepers of the moral framework, history doesn’t reward them with harmony. Instead, it rewards them with conflict, mistrust, and the slow degradation of the very moral foundation they claim to defend. And those who mainly want comfort, access, and advantage will often go along—because chameleon morality is profitable when you’re standing near the throne.

In a healthy society, the moral posture of elected officials should broadly reflect the people they serve—all of them, not just the loyal, the loud, and/or those who bend a knee. Moral diversity isn’t wrong; it’s necessary. But a line is crossed when one imposes their morality on others without dialogue. Majority rule matters, but so do minority rights—because “shared morality” without protection becomes tyranny with faux-moral backing.

Morals will keep evolving as life does. Moral fiber isn’t loud. It shows up in restraint, fairness, and the humility to admit, “I could be wrong.” A society isn’t shaken because people argue about morals; it is when the powerful stop being bound by anything—when “values” become a weapon, not a compass.

Find your moral fiber, but don’t stop there. Demand it—publicly and relentlessly—from anyone who seeks authority over your life. If they won’t live by civil standards, treat their immoral talk as propaganda to be challenged and rejected. One certainty: moral limits cease with mortality.  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

Joy in Alzheimer’s
W.C. Barron
Lap Around the Sun
Daily Steps Forward — W.C. Barron