Tag: oppressor

We like to stare in the mirror and tell ourselves a flattering story: that we are the guardian, the steady hand after chaos, the adult in a disorderly world. But history is less sentimental. Power does not stay still. It expands, rationalizes, and—if left unchecked—redefines itself.

This is our Zimbardo^{[1] [2]} moment. The guards didn’t start as tyrants. They became them over time. Not because of being inherently cruel, but because the role allowed it, rewarded it, and eventually made it the norm. We are unknowingly replicating that experiment both domestically and internationally. Once authority is absolute, it begins to reshape identity. Enforcement shifts into domination, control, and coercion.

The United States was never purely a guardian—though it once proudly assumed the mantle and maintained that stance. There was at least an effort at restraint, rules, institutional international bodies, and shared legitimacy. Now the tone has changed. When a nation declares, implicitly or explicitly, ‘we are a superpower and will act because we can,’ the world no longer sees stewardship. It sees a gorilla—massive, unchallenged, and increasingly indifferent to the damage it causes as it thrashes its arms around, asserts its will, and enforces its law and morality beyond its own borders.

This is not benevolent dominance; it is selective force. Weak nations aren’t protected because they are weak; they are often pressured because they are. Sovereignty becomes conditional, resources become targets, and nations are no longer seen as distinct societies with histories and rights. They are seen and treated as pieces on a board—deindividualized, reduced to utility.

The rhetoric stays polished: freedom, order, stability. But listen carefully. The rules are in effect—until they aren’t. Especially when the rule-maker finds them inconvenient. We hear; extraordinary threats justify extraordinary actions. But who decides what the threat is? Of course, the same hand that holds the power.

That is the pivot. When a hegemon starts to extend its internal narrative over external reality, and assumes its perception overrides others’ sovereignty. At that moment, it crossed from guardian to gorilla. Not because it abandoned ideals, but because it makes itself the exception to them.

And perhaps most dangerously, the world starts to comply. Domestic and international institutional capitulation—silent, gradual—strengthens the stance. Power, if not challenged, becomes assumed and then exploited on a massive scale.

The experiment never ends; it only scales. So the question is not whether the gorilla can justify the overt actions, but how the ape will be brought to heel. And history shows they always are, and the end is never pretty.  NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

… – .- -. -.. / ..-. — .-. / – .-. ..- – ….

[1] Haney, Craig, Curtis Banks, and Philip G. Zimbardo. “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison.” International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1, no. 1 (1973): 69–97.

[2] Le Texier, Thibault. “Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.” American Psychologist 74, no. 7 (2019): 823–839.