Posted in Current Events

Pawns of Power

poster declaring law should not be a weapon

Laws are supposed to be the bones of a society: neutral, structural, holding us upright. Law enforcement and the courts are meant to be the muscles that move those bones, not the fists of those who hold the throne or the majority. When that line blurs, when enforcement and justice become tools of power rather than its restraint, a nation quietly shifts away from a representative republic into a dystopian state.

We don’t have to look too far back in history for insight…

On the eve of the French Revolution, courts and law enforcement were not known for their impartiality. Judgeships were bought. Noble privilege was protected. Commoners knew they lived under one set of rules while the gilded lived under another. The Bastille didn’t fall because of seven prisoners; it fell because the building had become a cold stone symbol proclaiming that the law served the crown, not the people.

More recently, Nazi Germany carried this to an industrial scale. The regime did not usually act “outside” the law; it rewrote the law. Judges swore loyalty not to justice, but to Hitler. Police, courts, and camps formed a single pipeline: define enemies, demean them, label them criminal, process them through a legal machine designed to produce the same answer every time—guilty and repulsive. Decent people and law enforcement could tell themselves they were “following and upholding the law,” all the while the law itself had been converted into a weapon.

The pattern is always the same: two-track justice, selective enforcement, and a growing sense that legal outcomes can be predicted by status, ideology, race, ethnicity, or wealth before any evidence is heard. Power claims the language of order and safety, then quietly rigs the referees.

We should stop deceiving ourselves that “it can’t happen here.” Instead, we must ask: Are the laws and enforcement practices fair and impartial? Citizens need to question whether the justice system’s harshness is aimed downward and if mercy is truly reserved for the well-connected or like-minded. The uniforms, the architecture, and the slogans may differ. The logic does not. It may not be their intent, but their enforcement practices become a reality they must recognize. As many lose confidence in their independence, they lose support, which in turn leads to greater distrust and disdain.

A free society does not depend on the moral character of its rulers; it depends on the independence of its restraints. When those restraints are captured and controlled, the slide is already underway, even if the fragile skeletal forms of democracy remain.

So the uncomfortable question is this: Is law enforcement and justice beginning to tilt toward power? How long can ordinary citizens obey without quietly helping to destroy the very rule of law they claim to defend? When will they rise up, and will it be too late? Turn up the volume and blow your whistle loud and often. NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

Joy in Alzheimer’s
W.C. Barron
Lap Around the Sun
Daily Steps Forward — W.C. Barron

Posted in Current Events

Faceless Justice:

When did masks shift from villains to “authorities”?

If you're doing good you shouldn't have to hide behind a mask....

When I was a kid, masks were for the bad guys. Bandits in Westerns, bank robbers with bandanas, the Klan hiding under white hoods, and the muggers in dark alleys. A mask meant you didn’t want to be recognized because you were doing something you shouldn’t be doing. Evil hid its face. Goodness walked in daylight.

But now? Somewhere along the way, the script flipped. Those we were told to trust—law enforcement, federal agents—have adopted the mask. Acting with impunity, ICE officers are staging “operations,” Homeland Security agents are sweeping into neighborhoods, even U.S. Marshals and Border Patrol units, all with faces hidden. They now resemble the masked members of Patriot Front or Blood Tribe. Once respected symbols of authority, they are now appearing faceless, anonymous, and interchangeable. Supporters argue that the masks protect officers from retaliation or online targeting, but to the rest of us, it appears to be a means to avoid scrutiny and shirk accountability.

The claim is they’re targeting “the worst of the worst.” That phrase is supposed to conjure violent criminals, cartel bosses, or human traffickers. Yet the data tells a different story: government data shows that the majority — often well over half, approaching 70%—of ICE detainees have no criminal record at all. They’re being seized at immigration hearings where they’ve come voluntarily, pursued through farm fields, even pulled from schools and churches. They are NOT gunmen. Not the “worst of the worst.” They are just the easy ones. The soft targets. The ones who won’t shoot back.

Which raises the uncomfortable questions: do the masks hide fear, or shame? Fear of retaliation if they went after actual hardened criminals? Shame at arresting the powerless in the most public and humiliating of ways? Or maybe the mask makes it easier to see human beings as quotas instead of neighbors. Is this about public safety—or about hitting administrative numbers?

It’s a bitter irony. The only true ‘good guys’ who still wear masks today are doctors and firefighters. Their anonymity is a sacrifice, not secrecy. They shield their faces not to hide, but to protect and survive, thereby shielding others. That’s the difference. One mask hides identity to avoid accountability; the other shields life in the service of it.

The lesson is as old as childhood morality tales: if you hide your face to do your work, maybe, just maybe, it’s the kind of work that shouldn’t be done in the first place.

For Every Problem...A Solution...
Lap Around the Sun: Daily Steps Forward
Joy in Alzheimer’s: My Mom’s Brave Walk into Dementia’s Abyss