Posted in Political

The Optics of Weakness

When I worked in Syria, Assad’s pictures and banners were everywhere. There was a saying you heard quietly uttered and trusted immediately: You can tell the weakness of a leader by the number of his portraits hanging in public. It wasn’t cynical. It was observational. People who had lived under strongmen understood; power that must constantly announce itself is power that doubts its own legitimacy.

We once believed America was exempt from this rule. Our institutions were supposed to be independent, strong, equally balanced, and impersonal enough to keep authority both distributed and temporary. That confidence now seems naïve.

Modern American politics is increasingly visual, performative, and personality-driven. Faces dominate screens—names eclipse policies. Rallies resemble revival meetings. Loyalty is measured by personal allegiance rather than by commitment to constitutional principles. Flags, slogans, branded backdrops, portraits draped across government buildings, names adorning every possible grift, and omnipresent imagery—assertions of dominance in a restless, anxious public square.

When institutions lose trust, leaders step forward as symbols, as demigods. When governance grows complex and outcomes disappoint, image fills the void left by results. Legitimacy shifts from systems to the worship of individuals, from rules to personalities. The leader does not serve the institution; the institution is recast to serve the leader.

The more fragile trust becomes—in elections, courts, media, and science—the more faux leaders insist on being ever-present. Every success must bear their name and likeness. Every failure must be blamed on an enemy. Every criticism becomes sabotage and treason. In this environment, real leaders cannot afford to fade into the background of dysfunctional systems, which are themselves under strain.

This transformation is dangerous, not dramatic. Once power is personalized, disagreement becomes disloyalty. Oversight becomes persecution. Independent judges, journalists, and civil servants are no longer neutral actors but obstacles to image maintenance. Reality itself becomes negotiable because the image cannot tolerate correction. Facts that undermine the portrait must be attacked, dismissed, twisted, or replaced.

This is how republics erode without collapsing—slowly, legally, and often enthusiastically. Genuine leadership does not require constant reaffirmation. It does not need its face everywhere or its name in every chant. It governs through institutions robust enough to outlast any individual. It allows space for criticism because it is anchored in systems, not in the self. Weak leadership crowds out that space. It fills every silence. It demands recognition not because it has earned it, but because it fears what happens without it.

The sage wisdom still holds. You just have to know where to look. The walls are no longer plaster or stone. They are timelines, feeds, stages, and screens. Yet they tell the same story they always have—about insecurity masquerading as strength and the stark divide between leaders who trust and support institutions and those who need to be seen leading. The irony is that every image becomes an incendiary insult, inflaming resistance more than rallying support.

Once you recognize the pattern, the noise becomes legible. And once it is legible, it becomes impossible to ignore. Indeed, You can tell the weakness of a leader by the number of his portraits hanging in public; and history has a way of knowing which effigies to hang-up.    NeverFearTheDream   simplebender.com

Joy in Alzheimer’s
W.C. Barron
Lap Around the Sun
Daily Steps Forward — W.C. Barron
Posted in Political

The Intoxicating Mirage of American Greatness

We are no better than Don Quixote as he chased the demons he saw in windmills as we become drunk on the hysteria and mirage of American greatness. While he blamed magicians for his confusion and failure, we blame minorities and immigrants. We are no different; only our delusion is different.

Neither the Constitution nor the Preamble ever professes any illusion of aspiring to greatness. The Founding Fathers’ writings in the Federalist Papers are silent on any desire for national greatness. These men, willing to risk everything openly professed a desire for an independent nation. A nation recognized and respected as an equal by all the world’s other nations. They weren’t so egotistical to wave the vain flag of greatness or superiority.

Yet today, we insanely strive to regain something we never had, were, or will be. We are drunk on our delusions and egos. Being ‘great’ is a fixation of one’s ego. It isn’t real. It is your fantasized view of yourself. Something which, when unachieved or perceived to be lost, we blame everyone, anyone, but ourselves. Like Don Quixote blaming mystics and magicians, we lash out at everyone but ourselves. Ironically, we blame them for something that never was and can never be.

We are a country with many admirable traits and traditions and rich in resources and intellect. We are like almost every other country in the world. We all have our national pride, but our national ego is more of a liability than an asset. When working internationally, the first and biggest hurdle to overcome is not being the ‘arrogant, ugly American’ as we are known worldwide.

How do you determine ‘greatness?’ Is our historic and persistent racism a measure of greatness? As a country of immigrants, whose foundational economy was built on the backs of slaves, should our measure of greatness be the number of immigrant families we disjoined and caged or how we showed compassion? Is our historic and persistent racism a criterion of greatness? Is the denigration of minorities and the perpetuation of our domestic caste system our yardstick? Is the benchmark the number of citizens in the wealthiest Causation country suffering in poverty? Is it the number of books and ideas we can ban or sequester? Is the measure the need for a nanny state because we don’t trust half of the population to make their own decisions on healthcare? Or maybe it is our growing affinity to authoritarians and dictators rather than democracies? Democracy isn’t dead but authoritarianism a growing plague. Democracy conquered communism and now seems focused on conquering itself. A country boasting about greatness should have addressed and resolved these inequities decades ago. However, what we have shown incredible greatness in is our ability to deflect, ignore, and our propensity to find a scapegoat for our failures.

While we are a blessed nation, no country is great at everything. They all have strengths, weaknesses, and blind spots. The pragmatic salient question might be, ‘Should America strive to be average or average at all things?’ If we are average, we acknowledge there are those better than us in some things, and we are better in others. By being average at all things, we surrender those areas in which we can be superior.

Our desire and aspiration to be Great should not cloud the realization that we are just one among many in this world. Our founders knew this, and they promoted internationalism, not isolation, to gain acceptance and influence. They didn’t strive for dominance but for mutually beneficial relationships. In our drunken, intoxicated state of euphoria, touting our Greatness, let’s hope we ultimately don’t drive ourselves to Mediocrity.

Maybe our Greatness is our ability to cast an eye over our shoulder to see how far we’ve come, accept where we are, and then turn to look forward and have a vision of where we should be. Sober love of country over drunken delusions. NeverFearTheDream……simplebender.com

This was first published in the Bend Bulletin 11/20/24